i
The journal is open to receive papers throughout the year, except when there are calls for papers published on its Web page. Papers must be sent to the editor's email hcadenas@uchile.cl and not by registering on this page. It should be noted that due to the number of papers received, the evaluation of each paper can take between 4 and 8 months.
MAD also publishes articles in "Early View" version, which have been accepted for publication, peer-reviewed and corrected before the publication of the issue, allowing its readers to have quicker access to its contents. Each article has an online publication date and a DOI, allowing them to be cited as soon as they are published.
Please refer to the "Guidelines for the presentation and submission of papers".
World society, functional differentiation, center/periphery and dependency
Abstract
This paper proposes a dialogue between Niklas Luhmann's theory of world society and the dependency theories of Enzo Faletto/Fernando Henrique Cardoso and André Gunder Frank. The axis of this dialogue is the difference between center and periphery, their multiple dimensions, and their place in a theory of world society that can account for the multiplicity and contingency of relations between centres and peripheries in contemporary modernity. Dependency theories usually vary in the way they observe or neglect the contingency of the economic and political dependency structures of the peripheral countries in relation to the central countries. In this sense, a comparison between the conceptions of André Gunder Frank and Enzo Faletto/Fernando Henrique Cardoso seems interesting. Through this comparison, it seems to us that the reference frameworks of Cardoso/Faletto's analysis remain current for interpreting the reconfigurations in the relations between center and periphery, although it is necessary to broaden these frameworks, including both a greater differentiation in the degree of dependency and other spheres of social life, and emphasizing the multidimensional and pluralized character of the relations between center and periphery.Keywords:
World society, Functional differentiation, Center/periphery difference, Dependency theory, Latin AmericaReferences
Belinelli, L. y Helayel, K. (2022). Teoria, história e política em Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1969-78). Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 41(2), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.25091/S01013300202200020004
Cadenas, H. (2019). Sistemas y sistema-mundo: la crisis teórica en Immanuel Wallerstein. Estu-dios públicos, 156, 110-119.
Cairo, H. (2023). Geo-Politizando los Espacios Intermedios del Sistema-Mundo: Semicentros y Semiperiferias, Geoestrategias de Subordinación y de Autonomía en América Latina y Europa Meridional tras la Guerra Fría. Dados, 66 (4), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2023.66.4.305
Cardoso, F.H. y Faletto, E. (1970). (1970). Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Zahar Editores.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. University of Princeton.
Cordero, R. (2022). Crise e crítica. Sobre as frágeis fundações da vida social. Ateliê de Humanidades.
Crespo, M. V. (2022). Crisis in the Periphery: The Concept of “Crisis” in Latin American De-velopmentalism and Raúl Prebisch, 1929-1980. Sociología & Antropología, 12(3), 1-27.
De Giorgi, R. (2017). Periferias da Modernidade. Revista Direito Mackenzie, 11(2), 39-47
Domingues, J. M. (2010). Revisitando dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Serie Cader-nos Flasco, 1. https://flacso.redelivre.org.br/files/2014/12/N1-Domingues-Portugues.pdf (Accedido el 22 de marzo de 2019).
Domingues, J. M. (2008). Latin America and Contemporary Modernity. A Sociological Interpretation. Routledge..
Dutra, R. (2021). Por uma Sociologia Sistêmica Pós-Colonial da América Latina. Dados, 64(1), 1-35.
Dutra, R. (2016). A universalidade da condição secular. Religião e sociedade, 36(1), 151-174.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Die Vielfalt der Moderne. Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Fernandes, F. (1975). A revolução burguesa no Brasil: ensaio de interpretação sociológica. Zahar Editores.
Fernandes, F. (2008a). Sociedade de classes e subdesenvolvimento. Global
Fernandes, F. (2008b). Mudanças sociais no Brasil. Global.
Frank, A. G. (1972). Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment. Dependence, Class, and Politics in Latin America. Monthly Review Press.
Frank, A. G. (1971). Sociología del desarollo y subdesarollo de la sociología. El desarollo del subdesarollo. Anagrama.
Frank, A. G. (1969). Latin America - Underdevelopment or Revolution: Essays on the Development of Underdevelopment and the Immediate Enemy. Monthly Review Press.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. Monthly Review Press.
Galindo, J. (2006). Zwischen Notwendigkeit und Kontingenz. Theoretische Selbstbeobachtung der Soziologie. VS Verlag.
Germani, G. (1973). Política e Sociedade numa época de transição: da sociedade tradicional à sociedade de massas. Mestre Jou.
Grizelj, M. y Kirschstein, D. (2014) (eds.). Riskante Kontakte: Postkoloniale Theorien und Systemtheorie? Kadmos.
Heintz, B. y Werron, T. (2011). Wie ist Globalisierung möglich? Zur Entstehung globaler Vergleichshorizonte am Beispiel von Wissenschaft und Sport. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 63(3), 359-394.
Helayel, K. A. (2022). Entre afinidades e diferenças: Fernando Henrique Cardoso e a sociologia histórica. Sociologia & Antropologia, 12(3), 1-25.
Holzer, B. (2018). Varieties and Variations of Functional Differentiation. Soziale Systeme, 23(1-2), 15-30.
Luhmann, N. (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation: Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, N. (1987). Codierung und Programmierung. Bildung und Selektion in Erziehungssystem. En: Soziologische Aufklärung. Band 4 (pp. 182-201). Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, N. (1995a). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik 4. Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1995b). Kausalität im Süden. Soziale Systeme, 1(1), 7-28.
Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (2002). Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
Meyer, J. W. (1987). The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation-State. En: G.M. Thomas, J.W. Meyer, F.O. Ramirez, J. Boli (eds.), Institutional Structure. Constituting State, Society, and the Individual (pp. 41-70). Sage.
Mignolo, W. (2002). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. The South At-lantic Quarterly, 1001(1), 57-96.
Namkoong, Y. (1999). Dependency Theory: Concepts, Classifications, and Criticisms. International Area Review, 2(1), 121-150.
Neves, F. M. (2014). A contextualização da verdade ou como a ciência torna-se periférica. Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 14(3), 556-574.
Neves, F. M. (2009). A diferenciação centro-periferia como estratégia teórica básica para observar a produção científica. Revista de Sociologia e Política,17(34), 241-252.
Parsons, T. (1974). O sistema das sociedades modernas. Pioneira.
Randeria, S. (2000). Jenseits von Soziologie und soziokultureller Anthropologie: Zur Ortbestimmung der nichtwestlichen Welt in einer zukünftigen Sozialtheorie. En U. Beck y A. Kieserling (eds.), Ortsbestimmung der Soziologie: Wie die kommenden Generation Gesellschaftswissenschaften betreiben will (pp. 41-50). Nomos.
Ruggero, S. (2009). América Latina y la colonialidad. Un abordaje sistémico de las teorías pos-coloniales para una teoría pós-colonial. XXVII Congreso de la Asociación Latinoameri-cana de Sociología. VIII Jornadas de Sociología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Asociación Latinoamericana de Sociología, Buenos Aires, 2009. http://cdsa.aacademica.org/000-062/1211.pdf (Consultado el 20 de Marzo, 2018)
Seabra, R. L. (2019). Do dependentismo à teoria marxista da dependência: uma síntese crítica desta transição. Sociedade e Estado, 14(1), 261-283.
Shils, E. (1992). Centro e Periferia. Difel.7
Silva, L. T. da. (2022). Diferenciação e integração sistêmicas em Florestan Fernandes. Sociologia & Antropologia, 12(2), 1-28.
Stäheli, U. (2009). Die Konstruktion des Finanzpublikums: eine genealogische Analyse. En: R. Stichweh y P. Windolf (eds.), Inklusion und Exklusion: Analysen zur Sozialstruktur und sozialen Ungleichheit (pp. 259-272). VS Verlag.
Wallerstein, I. (1993). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Werron, T. (2007). Publika. Zur Globalisierungsdynbamik von Funktionssystemen. Soziale Sys-teme, 13(1-2), 386-388.
Twitter