Artificial legitimacy?

Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible. The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. New York: Penguin.

Baecker, D. (2007). Communication With Computers, or How Next Society Calls for an Understanding of Temporal Form. Soziale Systeme, 13(1+2), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2007-1-235

Banko, M. y Brill, E. (2001). Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 26-33). Toulouse: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. y Pinch, T. J. (1989). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Bridle, J. (2018). New Dark Age. Technology and the End of the Future. Verso.

Budak, C., Nyhan, B., Rothschild, D., Thorson, E. y Watts, D. (2024). Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation. Nature, 630, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07417-w

Calise, S. (2014). La emergencia del medio digital y su caracterización como medio de medios. Papeles de Trabajo, 8(13): 272-292.

Costa, A. L. (2022). Like/dislike como metacódigo moral e acelerador social. Latitude, 16(2), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.28998/lte.2022.n.2.13723

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI. Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Davenport, T. (2014). Big D@ta at Work. Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press

Edwards, P. N. (1996). The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Engstrom, D., Ho, D., Sharkey, C. y Cuéllar, M. (2020). Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 20-54.

Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. New York: Routledge.

Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.

Feenberg, A. (2017) Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

Feenberg, A.; Nielsen, T. H. y Winner, L. (Eds.). (1997). Technology and Democracy: Technology in the Public Sphere - Proceedings from Workshop 1. Oslo: Center for Technology and Culture.

Ellul, J. (1977). Le Système technicien. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

Ellul, J. (1988). Le Bluff technologique. Paris: Hachette.

Esposito, E. (2017). Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(4), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014

Esposito, E. (2022). Artificial Communication: How Algorithms Produce Social Intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Forte, Miguel Ángel et al. (2012) Las TIC como problemática de la teoría sociológica. Entramados y perspectivas, 2(2), 205-226.

Floyd, C., Züllighoven, H., Budde, R. y Keil-Slawik, R. (eds.). (1992). Software Development and Reality Construction. New York/Berlin: Springer.

Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. y Foot. K. (eds), Media Technologies: Essays in Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 167-194). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (195). Problemas de legitimación en el capitalismo tardío. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, J. y Witte, M. (2023). The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. SSRN Electronic Journal (January 1, 2023) http://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.11733

Hays, J. y Efros, A. (2007). Scene completion Using millions of photographs. SIGGRAPH, 26(3).

Heck, J., Itschert, A. & Tratschin, L. (2017). Legitimation durch Verfahren: Zum Entstehungskontext und zur Aktualität eines Nicht-Klassikers. Soziale Systeme, 22(1-2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0001

Just, N., y Latzer, M. (2017). Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716643157

Kallinikos, J. (2006). Information out of information: on the self-referential dynamics of information growth. Information. Technology & People, 19(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610649989

Kette, S. y Tacke, V. (2021). Editorial: Die Organisation im Zoo der Digitalisierungsforschung. Soziale Systeme, 26(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2021-0001

Kieserling, A. (2012). Legitimation durch Verfahren (1969). In O. Jahraus y A. Nassehi (Hrsg.), Luhmann Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung (pp. 145-150). Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler

Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481

Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York: Knopf.

Latour, B. (1984). Les microbes, guerre et paix, suivi de Irréductions. Paris: Métailié-La Découverte.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In: J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge.

Latour, B. (1994). On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3: 29-64.

Latour, B. (1996a). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1996b). On Interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4): 228-245.

Latour, B. (1999a). Pandora`s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1999b). Factures/Fractures. From the concept of network to the concept of attachment. Res, 36: 20-31.

Luhmann, N. (1975). Legitimation durch Verfahren. 2a. Ed. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. (1981). Die Unwahrscheinlichkeit der Kommunikation. In N. Luhmann: Soziologische Aufklärung III. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (pp. 25-34). Opladen: Westdeutscher.

Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. (2015). Politische Soziologie. Ed. A. Kieserling. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

Lushetich, N. (ed.). (2022). Big Data – A New Medium? Routledge.

Machura, S. (2017). Legitimation durch Verfahren – was bleibt? Soziale Systeme, 22(1-2), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2017-0010

Malsch, T. (1997). Die Provokation der „Artificial Societies“. Warum die Soziologie sich mit den Sozialmetaphern der Verteilten Künstlichen Intelligenz beschäftigen sollte. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1997-0101

Marton, A. (2009). Self-Referential Technology and the Growth of Information: From Techniques to Technology to the Technology of Technology. Soziale Systeme, 15(1): 138-159. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2009-0109

Mascareño, A. (2024). Contemporary visions of the next apocalypse: Climate change and artificial intelligence. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(2), 352-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310241234448

Napoli, P. (2010). Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

Nassehi, A. (2019). Muster: Eine Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. München: C.H. Beck.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. London: Allen Lane.

Open AI. (2022). Introducing ChatGPT. Disponible en: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

Oudshoorn, N. y Pinch T. J. (2003). How users matter the co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Perriault, J. (1989). La logique de l’usage. Essai sur les machines à communiquer. Paris: Flammarion.

Pignuoli Ocampo, S. (2016). Diadismo en los fundamentos sociológicos de Luhmann y Latour. Comunicación y asociación comparadas. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 155: 133-150.

Pignuoli Ocampo, S. (2022). Comunicación digital: Definición operativa y aproximación a la participación bajo la forma inclusión/exclusión digital. MAD, 46, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0527.2022.68542

Pignuoli Ocampo, Sergio. (2024). Comunicação digital e participação dos dispositivos no mundo social. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia do Direito, 11(2), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.21910/rbsd.v11i2.815

Pignuoli Ocampo, S. (2025). Para uma sociologia da comunicação artificial: condições, tipos e impactos na sociedade. Sociologia & Antropologia, 15(2): e250025. https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752025v1528

Pinch, T. J. y Bijker W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3): 399-441.

Pinheiro, Á. et al. (2023). Intelligent Framework to Support Technology and Business Specialists in the Public Sector. IEEE Access, 11, 15655-15679.

Pink. S. (2022). Emerging Technologies. Life at the Edge of the Future. London, New York: Routledge.

Pohle, J. y Lenk, K. (eds.). (2021). Der Weg in die "Digitalisierung" der Gesellschaft. Was können wir aus der Geschichte der Informatik lernen? Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.

Qvortrup, L. (2006). Understanding New Digital Media. Medium Theory or Complexity Theory? European Journal of Communication, 21(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106066639

Rammert, W. (1995). Soziologie und künstliche Intelligenz. Produkte und Probleme einer Hochtechnologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

Ramsay, S. (2010). Reading Machines: Towards an Algorithmic Criticism. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

Rozado, D. (2023). The Political Biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030148

Schaeffer, P. (1970). Machines à communiquer. Tome 1: Genèse des simulacres. Paris: Seuil.

Schaeffer, P. (1972). Machines à communiquer. Tome 2: Pouvoir et communication. Paris: Seuil.

Schwartz, G. (2020). As constituições estão mortas? Momentos constituintes e comunicações constitucionalizantes dos novos movimentos sociais do século XXI. 2ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.

Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stamford, A. y Luckwu, M. (2022). Algoritmos de inteligência artificial e decisão jurídica: o caso da ELIS do Tribunal de Justiça de Pernambuco. Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região, 34(3): 26-42.

Susskind, R. (2017). Tomorrow´s Lawyers. An Introduction to your Future. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press.

Taekke, J. (2022). Algorithmic Differentiation of Society – a Luhmann Perspective on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 18(1), p. 2-23. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.202216225

Teubner, G. (2018) Digitale Rechtssubjekte? Zum privatrechtlichen Status autonomer Softwareagenten / Digital Personhood? The Status of Autonomous Software Agents in Private Law. Ancilla Iuris, 106, 107-149. Trans. Jacob Watson.

Trebor, S. (Ed.). (2013). Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.

Weber, M. (1964). Economía y sociedad. México: FCE.

Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder. New York: Times Books.

Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press, 1977.

Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Zhou, L., Schellaert, W., Martínez-Plumed, F., Moros-Daval, Y., Ferri, C. y Hernández-Orallo, J. (2024). Larger and more instructable language models become less reliable. Nature, 634, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07930-y

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile.